The Seer

The aware Awareness that sees everything as ItSelf

Archive for the 'Self-inquiry' Category

Are You Ready to Lose Your World?

January 23rd, 2008 by Pete


There is a very famous poem written by the third patriarch of Zen, Seng-ts’an, called the Hsin-Hsin Ming, which translates as Verses in Faith Mind. In this poem Seng-ts’an writes these lines: “Do not seek the truth; only cease to cherish opinions.” This is a reversal of the way most people go about trying to realize absolute truth.

Most people seek truth, but Seng-ts’an is saying not to seek truth. This sounds very strange indeed. How will you find truth if you don’t seek it? How will you find happiness if you do not seek it? How will you find God if you do not seek God? Everyone seems to be seeking something. In spirituality seeking is highly honored and respected, and here comes Seng-ts’an saying not to seek.

The reason Seng-ts’an is saying not to seek is because truth, or reality, is not something objective. Truth is not something “out there.” It is not something you will find as an object of perception or as a temporal experience. Reality is neither inside of you nor outside of you….

This article by Adyashanti is continued on his Web page.

Category: Self-inquiry, Adyashanti, Poetry | No Comments »

Abiding in Love

January 16th, 2008 by Pete


Recently, I was meditating on the words ascribed to St John who is believed by many to be a Jnani (a seer) as well as a Christian saint. You may remember he wrote: “God is love … ” and then added, “he that abides in love, abides in God and God in him.” (1 John 4:16)

To abide or dwell in love doesn’t mean for us, as a separate entity, to have constant love for some object or person, divine or otherwise. John wants us to see here that love — true love — is not something we have or do, but rather what we are in essence — already and always.

Consider what is the greatest ‘love’ of any sentient being. If he had the choice of possessing either all the wealth in the world or his ‘beingness’ or ‘consciousness’ (call it what you will), that which gives him the sense of being alive and present, and without which the body would be nothing but a cadaver, what would he choose? Obviously, without consciousness, all the wealth in the world would be of no use to him.

It is this conscious presence one loves more than anything else because without it, there is no universe, no anything! This therefore, is Presence-Love-God. And St John obviously had this in mind when he said, “God is love ….”

This conscious presence which makes us aware of this, here, now — the beingness of every sentient being on the earth — and indeed, the very soul of the entire universe, — this cannot be anything other than God.

It is clear that he meant that he (John) and He (God) were not different as pure subjectivity, but one in conscious awareness. And, therefore, he who is anchored in the conscious presence that is Love — that is God — abides in God and God in him.

The Love John speaks of here is love for the mere (or mysterious) fact of existence itself.

As Adyashanti says, It isn’t a love that is caused by anything. It isn’t based on whether one has a good day, or a good encounter, or a good feeling etc. In fact, it could be not such a good day, not such a good encounter, or not such a good feeling, and there will be still just as much love for it.

This is a love that loves to live this life because in life it is actually meeting itself moment to moment.

Category: Self-inquiry, Adyashanti, Practice, The Teaching | No Comments »

Modern Alchemy

November 26th, 2007 by Pete


Hi Juvenal,You asked: “have you ever read about alchemy?”

Yes, I have and now understand that most, if not all, of the great alchemists of past centuries were actually investigators, practitioners and teachers of non-dual philosophy. In earlier times, in religion-dominated societies, it was often quite dangerous for individuals to openly explore non-dual spiritual teaching, so they were forced to do this under the guise of searching for the so-called philosopher’s stone that would turn base-metal into gold. They knew this stated pursuit would be tolerated and even approved by wealth-seeking ecclesiastics and local authorities who would not then question their researches, collecting of books and travels to other enlightened masters etc. Of course, they had to set up laboratories and ‘experiments’ to keep up appearances, but their real passion was to discover the truth of man’s essential nature and pass their insights on to other earnest seekers.

Naturally, there were many thousands of lesser souls who heard about the lab equipment and thought there was a real chance that someone could create gold out of sheet lead, got in on the act and wasted the rest of their lives on a futile search for riches. The imitators, like the ecclesiastics, never guessed what the real alchemists were up to.

To the true alchemists, the so-called philosopher’s stone was a symbol of the transmuting power of truth when it is known, understood and practiced. They, as we have seen, were not in quest of a magical stone, but That which transmutes the ordinary into the extraordinary, the mundane into the divine, discord into harmony and mind-made suffering into peace. What they yearned for was found, not by some feat of wizardry or arduous attainment, but by simply seeing that all is Consciousness (or God) and that everything that appears is actually an expression of the divine Source! After this direct inseeing and consequent shift in their understanding of what constituted reality, they had to use symbolic language and codes to record their discovery.

One of the ways they might do this was to write an encrypted book or engrave a tablet that purported to be about turning base-metal into gold, but was really about the ultimate understanding or ‘enlightenment’. They had to be extremely secretive, for if their real purpose was found out, they know they could be put to death for being a heretic or a blasphemer. To the society of their day, the enlightened alchemists were content to be regarded as harmless cranks and dubious scholars.

Awakened or ‘enlightened’ people have never enlightened everyone that came in contact with them. We see this most obviously in the cases of Jesus and Gautama (Buddha). In fact, only a small number of those who encountered these great souls seemed to truly understand their teaching. (many are called but few are chosen.)

Why was this? Well, Juvenal, it’s pretty much the same today. Just as the heat of an oven will soften butter,but harden clay, so conscious awareness or the awareness of truth in a seer will attract those who are ready to awaken and repel those who are not. Those who are fully conscious will help those who are just beginning to wake up spiritually to become more and more conscious, while their effect on spiritually unconscious people will be to drive them further into unconsciousness and mind-conditioned behavior. You will probably be experiencing this to some degree or other right now among your associates in Iraq.

The good news, Juvenal, is that there are still ‘enlightened’ teachers in our midst today, only they are no longer disguised as alchemists, but as fairly ordinary people who wear blue-jeans, drive cars and use computers etc. Through their low-profile work, figuratively speaking, base stuff is being transmuted into gold in the lives of many who stumble upon them and recognize what they have to offer. But this only happens, it seems, when what is Deep in the teacher can reach what is Deep in the seeker. Then “Deep calls unto Deep”, and with the answering, there begins a steady transformation on every level of the respondent’s life-experience. A golden moment indeed!

Category: Seeing, Truth, Self-inquiry, Our World, Non-duality, The Teaching | No Comments »

The Next Step

November 24th, 2007 by Pete


Hi Robb,

Thanks for your very kind note. I enjoy working with you especially because I sense you have a real desire to know the truth and make it the foundation of your life experience.

You have done well to recognise the importance of being aware of the Self, but the next step is to see or understand that you ARE that Awareness or Self. Its only because of our conditioning that we think we ‘have’ a Self or that we can see it like one sees a tree, for instance.

The more we awaken from that conditioning, as one awakens from a dream, the clearer you see that essentially, you are that limitless Self, but that you are having a temporary limited human experience — an experience as Robb!

Approaching life with this understanding or viewpoint helps to get everything into proportion and frees up energies previously wasted on regret about the past or worry about the future. You are so fortunate that you are presently on the path of freedom, and if you stay on it, your life will be blessed beyond imagination.

Category: Mentoring, Seeing, Self-inquiry | No Comments »

The One That is All

November 15th, 2007 by Pete


Encouraged by the great tradition of the Inner Light at my core, and inspired by my direct vision of it, I submit with reverence to what it lights up.

Here I am at once this central Awareness or Consciousness and what it’s conscious of, which is none other than its own region-by-region embodiment, its cosmic constitution.

The view out from here embraces the One-centred but many-levelled physique that is the expression and instrument and object of the Consciousness that I AM, and I take it as I find it.

From: The Trial of the Man who said he was God, by Douglas Harding

Category: Seeing, Self-inquiry | No Comments »

Aware of Both Dimensions

November 11th, 2007 by Pete


Dear Carrie,Thank you for your inquiry. What I understand Gangaji to be saying in the passage below is that most people identify very strongly and only with the ’story’ of their life up to the present moment. They feel defined by what they have done or not done, and what others have done or not done to them. They feel that life began for them when they were born and wlll end when their body/mind/personality dies. Because such people seem not to be conscious of any other dimension of their life … they could be said to be ‘unconscious’ in this sense.

As consciousness arises in an unconscious person, however, they begin to ‘notice’ their thoughts, feelings and sensory perceptions etc. and as more consciousness arises, they begin to notice that they are noticing these internal phenomena.

You could say that first there is awareness of things and then there is awareness of Awareness itself which is a no-thing or what might be called ‘Spirit’.

It is then seen that while things in awareness come and go, Awareness Itself does not — it is always there and changeless, because it is not a ‘thing’ that can change. At this point, it may be recognized or understood, that one’s previous total identification with the body/mind/personality and its ’story’ was incorrect — and it is then understood, that in fact, one is much more than this — that there is an infinite and eternal dimension to us as well as a finite and temporal dimension. It is then seen that we are Life Itself and not merely our life experience.

The ego here is very subtle or tricky and there is the possibility if we are not properly guided, that we will swing from identifying totally with the body/mind/personality and its (poor me?) story, to total identification with ‘Spirit’ or the formless Self. The egoic mind then thinks it must reject the material things as being ‘unspiritual’ and if it is ‘allowed’ to do so, then one form or separation and division is simply replaced with another. Also, one story — “I am what happened to this body/mind etc.” is neatly replaced with another story, ie. “I am this spiritual ’being’ who is no longer a body/mind etc.”

The truth that Gangaji is pointing to in the passage below, as I see it, is that in reality, It is all one — and there is no separation or division, or in other words, It’s all God! We are not either finite or infinite, but both at the same time and that neither dimension should be ignored or denied. The truth is, she asserts, is that we are already and always Source and temporarily a particular expression of Source. It can be said, that while being inseparable from the Formless, we are a particular form and within that form, there arise countless other forms — thoughts, ideas, concepts, emotions, bodily sensations, sensory perceptions etc.

The person who is truly awake or conscious, Gangaji is saying, is a two-dimensional being, whereas, the person who is unawake or unconscious could be said to function only in one dimension (even though they too are inately two-dimensional). The barely awake or deluded person will have some understanding of the formless (compared with form) dimension of their life but will identify with only one or the other, and may even alternate between one or the other at various stages in their life experience … which would amount to just another episode in the old self-defining story.

Carrie, I hope this has clarified the quote a little for you. If not, please get back to me with more specific questions. Of course, if you can pick up a copy of Gangaji’s excellent book, The Diamond in Your Pocket’ and read the quote in its context, I’m sure that would bring even more clarification for you.

Category: Awakening, Truth, Seeing, Self-inquiry, The Teaching | No Comments »

Denying Your Story

November 11th, 2007 by Pete


For most spiritual seekers, the belief that personal identification
obstructs self-realization gives rise to the drive to get rid of the
personal story. But this is still just another part of the story. It
is so important to recognize this. Attempting to get rid of the story
is just another tangent of the story, another example of the power of
mind to control.

I have often seen in spiritual circles that instead of a real
examination of our storylines, there is a tendency to suppress the
story. In that suppression, the story may seem to be removed, but
there is still no peace. You cannot rest in the beauty and
transcendence of yourself while suppressing the story of yourself.

The story is still going on, but since you identify yourself as a
spiritual seeker, you push it out of conscious awareness. Spiritual
conditioning has simply taken the place of worldly conditioning. The
story is still operating, but now it operates subconsciously. And you
are confused as to why you still suffer.

Continued suffering is proof that your story is still being told. If
you are willing to not label that suffering as bad, then you can be
willing to simply see what the story is.

From: The Diamond in Your Pocket by Gangaji>

Category: Truth, Seeing, Self-inquiry, The Teaching | No Comments »

Pick Your Poison

October 24th, 2007 by Pete


In the Sept/Oct Advaita Fellowship Newsletter, Wayne Liquorman writes:

I am periodically taken to task for not having a teaching style more like some of my preceptors - most notably, Nisargadatta Maharaj. Maharaj was famous for speaking from the standpoint of the Absolute. He would say things such as, “I was never born and I will never die” and “I am awake even when I am asleep.” Such assertively non-dual statements sometimes had the effect of shocking his listeners into a profound, transcendent Seeing.

I am sympathetic to this approach but I have rarely been comfortable using it. I feel much more at home when I am meeting my listeners where THEY are…most of them believing that they were born and will die and that they are asleep while asleep. From this point of “obvious” truth we can then proceed to examine the more profound, underlying nature of this “one” who lives and dies and sleeps.

No one can deny that there is EXISTENCE here. The nature of that EXISTENCE can (and has been) debated endlessly. But this EXISTENCE is self-proving. It is not a philosophical debating point but a self-affirming Truth. It is here at the center when you pull off the onion-like layers of your apparent self - the self that lives and dies and sleeps and wakes.

We are the victims of our beliefs. When you “believe” the pointers of a teacher such as Maharaj the inevitable result is a kind of nihilism in which all that is apparent (including yourself) is denied as meaningless and illusory. When you believe the pointers of a teacher such as myself the inevitable result is the sense of having a progressively deeper and truer knowledge about the nature of Existence.

So pick your poison. With a little luck…either one will kill “you.”

With much love,
Wayne

Category: Seeing, Self-inquiry, The Teaching | No Comments »

What is Self-Realization, Awakening or Enlightenment?

September 11th, 2007 by Pete


Awareness is peace. It’s prior to, during and after all experience. It’s the constant underlying state — The Natural State. It’s the underlying essence of everything. If you’re reading these words then you are aware right now. In your daily experience, you’re always aware of something — whether it’s your daily activities, or it’s a series of thoughts about your career, your relationships, your finances. And you are always present as awareness watching, noticing.

What we want in life is peace, love, and the sense that everything is okay, isn’t it? Find out for yourself. Because if that’s what you want, it’s already here. It’s free. There are no requirements. No requirements at all. You don’t have to make any money. You don’t have to have any relationships. You don’t have to have a career. You need nothing! Absolutely nothing. It’s free! It’s absolutely free. It’s what you are — awareness.

Just notice, I am aware. Notice the awareness that you are — not the concept of awareness. If you can hear anything, see anything, feel anything — it’s the awareness that’s hearing, seeing, and feeling. Awareness is timelessly present. It’s not yesterday, it’s not tomorrow. It’s always now. You don’t have to wait five minutes, nor can you go back in time five minutes. It’s this point of timeless, spaceless awareness that’s always seeing, hearing, tasting, touching, smelling.

The experience that arises in awareness is absolutely irrelevant — it does not touch the peace. Whether I lose every penny I have, or I win the lottery — I am untouched as awareness. Because I am here watching, feeling, sensing.

This awareness is absolutely free. It doesn’t cost anything. You don’t have to invest time manipulating your relationships, your career, or your finances. You don’t have to do anything! It’s free. This is the resolution to all psychological suffering. This awareness is what I am. So, knowing what I am, what we are — we are the peace, the love, the sense that everything is okay — this is what I am. This is what we are.

by Stephen Wingate

Category: Truth, Self-inquiry | No Comments »

Where Does Misery Come From?

September 4th, 2007 by Pete


Nearly always, a “miserable experience” arises from the evaluation of “things,” but the equanimity everyone wants resides beyond “things” with the Real — and the Real is That which is being this consciousness of things.

For a time one seems bound to the belief that his misery is “out there,” even while his agony is the “awful feeling of fear and foreboding within.” One may believe an errant member of a family is the cause the agony, but it’s the agony of that belief which is felt within as a disturbance of one’s equanimity.

To eliminate the agony, for the past ten thousand years we have been doing everything possible to change the suspected cause of it ”out there” with the husband, daughter, business or something else.

We have believed that if we could see an external situation change, automatically we would feel the restoration of some degree of equanimity; and we did, perhaps, for short time, until something else “out there” failed to gee-haw.

Now listen: This procedure puts us and leaves us at the mercy of “thing”! This makes the ‘feeling within” tributary to appearances without. This is self-imposed slavery.

The presence (or absence) of something we see is good or bad only as we are of the opinion that it is good or bad. The image has no value of its own. We have given it value (hence power) based on its desirability — “I like it; or don’t like it.” Yet, all enlightened instruction speaks of the joy to be experienced when desire is overcome. Can one conceive of a more immediate way to overcome the desire for things than to recognize their valuelessness and then to perceive the impossibility of being one who desires

We have been told that Heaven, Tranquillity, is within. Heaven is opinionless, desireless Awareness. As long as we look to people, things, or conditions for happiness, we are making “heaven” tributary to the object of perception. One who stands identified as tranquil Awareness itself finds people, things and conditions tributary to his harmonious Identity.

Tranquility is our Identity. We are not another identity attempting to experience the absence of desire. If we believe we find happiness and harmony, then we must believe we can lose them. In addition, we must believe they are absent (or can be) at the moment. We can no more be absent from Identity than light can be absent from light.

From: A Guide To Awareness And Tranquillity pp 188, by William Samuel

Category: Seeing, Self-inquiry | No Comments »